Reaction to "Don't Fight Flames with Flames" 11/20/2016

Despite the fact that the author probably had good intentions when writing this article, his whiny tone made it unpleasant to read. He opens up by telling the readers about an instance when he was attacked on Twitter for voicing his opinion on Trayvon Martin. For example, he states that if reader tries to insert their input "One person says one thing and then the digital mob is upon you". The author then rants about how social media is a catalyst for destructive arguments. Despite the fact that the author got expert opinions, they sounded more salty than informative. He states that instant replies only "perpetuates conflict". In conclusion, "Don't Fight Flames with Flames" was an unpleasant read.